Cit vs mysore chromite ltd

Author: brvi

August undefined, 2024

Websentative of some of the Indian chromite deposits in Andhra, Bihar, Orissa, Mysore and Madras, and include one specimen from Baluchistan in Pakistan. The location of the … WebCIT vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority (2010) 322 ITR 61 (P & H) 14.S. 22 - INCOME FROM HOUSE PROPERTY – BUSINESS INCOME - S. 28 . Rent from premises with fittings. Appointment between business income and income from house property held to be justified. CIT & Anr. vs. Mysore Inter Continental Hotel P. Ltd. (2010) 322 ITR 116 …

Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd V. C.i.t. West Bengal, Calcutta

http://lawfaculty.du.ac.in/files/course_material/VI_Term2024/LB-604%20Principles%20of%20Taxation%20Law.pdf WebCIT v. Mysore Sugar Co. Ltd. - Taxpublishers.in User Panel Home Income Tax Case Laws Analysis Relied on Nortel Networks India (P) Ltd. v. DCIT 2024 TaxPub (DT) 6419 (Del … greencroft car sale car wash \\u0026 tyre fitment

ON THE COMPOSITION OF SOME INDIAN CHROMITES*

WebMar 11, 2011 · Mysore Minerals Ltd. (2) 2001 250 ITR...725 Kar This was a case in respect of mining of granite. The Division Bench held that it would amount to manufacture relying on an earlier judgment in CIT v. Mysore Minerals Ltd. (1... Deputy Commissioner Of … WebCIT vs. Sugauli Sugar Works (P) Ltd. 236 ITR 518 followed in CIT vs. Abdul Ahad 247 ITR 710 (J&K) wherein CIT vs. T.vs.S. Sundaram Iyengar & Sons Ltd. 222 ITR 344 (SC) … WebJun 30, 2024 · CIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98 indiankanoon.org link casemine.com link legitquest.com link Civil Appeal No. 117 of 1953 … floyd cox edgewater fl

A Note on State of Madras v. Ramalingam & Co., A.I.R. 1956 Mad.

NLSIU MBLAll Module Summary Syllabus PDF - Scribd

WebThe Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras Vs. Mysore Chromite Limited [1954] INSC 106 (1 November 1954) 2. Navin Chandra Mafatlal Vs. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay City [1954] INSC 107 (1 November 1954) ... Muir Mills Co., Ltd. Vs. Suti Mills Mazdoor Union, Kanpur [1954] INSC 110 (19 November 1954) 6. P. Joseph John Vs. … WebCIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98. 37. P.S.N.S. Ambalavana Chettiar v. Express Newspapers Ltd. (1968) 2 SCR 239 : AIR 1968 SC 741. 38. Agricultural Market Committee v. Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd. (1997) 5 SCC 516 : AIR 1997 SC 2502. 39. Pearson v. floyd co va high schoolWeb2 I.C.D.S Ltd v. CIT [2013] 29 taxmann.com 129 (SC) The Supreme Court in the case of Poddar Cement (P.) Ltd.3 and Mysore Minerals Ltd.4 observed that it is the beneficial ownership and not the titular ownership that is relevant for a valid claim of depreciation allowance under the Act. However, in the instant case, the Supreme Court greencroft bottling co

"" - Cit vs mysore chromite ltd

Cit vs mysore chromite ltd

CT Case Analysis PDF Invoice Negotiable Instrument

http://www.in.kpmg.com/taxflashnews/KPMG-Flash-News-Mother-Hospital-Pvt-Ltd-2.pdf Websentative of some of the Indian chromite deposits in Andhra, Bihar, Orissa, Mysore and Madras, and include one specimen from Baluchistan in Pakistan. The location of the main chromite deposits of India is indi-cated on the accompanying sketch map. UsBs on CnnourrB Chromite is used for various purposes which can be classed as metal-

Did you know?

WebMar 9, 2024 · PR CIT Vs LH Sugar Factory Pvt Ltd (D ated: February 27, 2024) On appeal, the Supreme Court condones the delay and grants leave to the Revenue to defend their case against M/s L H Sugar Factory in relation to issue of carbon credit. 2024-TIOL-102-SC-IT CIT Vs Balak Capital Pvt Ltd (D ated: February 27, 2024) WebMysore Chromite Limited . Case Information CITATION CODES citation codes CASE NO. On Appeal from the Judgment and Order dated the 29th day of March, 1951 of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Case Referred No. 44 of 1948.,Civil Appeal No. 117 of 1953, decided on 1st day of November, 1954 ATTORNEY(S)

WebJUDGMENT Decision of Madras High Court in COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS v. MYSORE CHROMITE LTD. [1951] (20 I. T. R. 546) affirmed. Appeal from … WebJan 14, 2013 · In the opinion of the CIT (Appeals), the language used in the rules clearly specified that enhanced depreciation allowance is available only when the trucks are used in the business of running them on hire also. The appellant has only a leasing business and it does not run a business of hiring trucks to the public.

WebCIT v Mysore Chromite Ltd (1995) 27 ITR 128 SC Place of Accrual 4. B R Naik V CIT De Jure or De Facto Control section 6 (2) of IT Act, 1961 5. Kunnathat Thathunni Moopil Nair etc., v State of Kerala and another AIR 1961 SC 552 6. Addl CIT v Ram Kripal Tripathi (1980 125 ITR 408 All) Profession value of Benefits (s 2 (24) and 28 (iv) 1961) 7. WebCommissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras v/sMysore Chromite Limited Case Referred 44 of 1948 Decided On, 29 March 1951 At, High Court of Judicature at Madras By, THE …

WebNov 3, 2024 · CIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98 Posted on June 30, 2024 CIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98 indiankanoon.org link casemine.com link legitquest.com link Continue reading Posted in LLB III Sem, Special Contracts, Topic 7: Effects of Sale, Uncategorized Leave a comment

http://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/ms-i-c-d-s-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-income-tax-mysore-anr floyd covey collierville tnWebCIT vs Divine Leasing and Finance Ltd., General Exports and Credits Ltd., Lovely Exports (P) Ltd. Citation 299 ITR 268 197 Taxation 43 158 Taxman 440 207 CTR 38 LexReported COCA-COLA EXPORT CORPORATION vs ITO and ANR.Applied 231 ITR 200 CIT vs Stellar Investment Ltd Distinguished and explained 192 ITR 287 Nirma Industries Ltd. … floyd co va commonwealth attorneyWebMysore Chromite Limited [1954] INSC 106 (1 November 1954) January February March April May June July August September October November December. The … green croft bristolWebFeb 8, 2000 · The High Court relying on its own decision in Ramkumar Mills P. Ltd. v. CIT [1989] 180 ITR 464, answered the question in the affirmative, that is, against the assessee. The aggrieved assessee has preferred this appeal pursuant to a certificate under section 261 of the Act granted by the High Court. floyd cramer christmas music youtubeWebTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS vs MYSORE CHROMITE LIMITED. Supreme Court, 01-11-1954 Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related Vincent … greencroft car sale car wash \u0026 tyre fitmenthttp://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/ms-i-c-d-s-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-income-tax-mysore-anr green croft centre herefordWebApr 29, 2011 · Cited By: 1. Coram: 1. ...concluded by a decision of this Court in IT Ref. No. 312 of 1961 in the case of CIT vs. Bharat Sugar Mills Ltd., judgment wherein was...of this Court in IT Ref. No. 166 of 1985 in the case of CIT vs. New India Sugar Mills judgment wherein was delivered on 12th April, 1990...assessee. 5. greencroft charlottesville