WebFeb 3, 2024 · In the recent Singapore Court of Appeal case BNA v BNB and another [2024] SCGA 84 ("BNA v BNB"), we are reminded that it is important to have a clearly drafted arbitration agreement. This article ... Web新加坡2024年7月1日公布了一个关于国际仲裁案件的高等法庭判决:BNA v BNB [2024] SGHC 142 (注:由于涉及商业隐私,新加坡法院对当事人做了隐名处理。BNA和BNB均 …
BNA v BNB [2024] SGHC 142 – gavc law – geert van calster
WebJul 5, 2013 · Update 22 June 2024 see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2024] NSWCA 82 for a view from Australia, particularly Andre Bell J’s dissenting opinion.. Update 16 January 2024 the grounds in [2024] SGCA 84 BNA v BNB are finally out– thank you again Filbert Lam for letting me know. I shall post separately on the issues. (Note see … WebThe proceedings were consolidated with another arbitration . BXY v BXX[2024] SGHC(I) 11 3 ... [36] and BNA v BNB and another [2024] SGHC 142 at [10] (the latter case having been decided after the hearing of this application). The Issues 19 The issues in the application were: (a) procedurally, whether the application was brought within the 30 millicent prothesis
[2024] SGHC 142
WebQin Huaping. Determination of the place of arbitration in international commercial arbitration and its legal significance — starting from BNA v. BNB and another case [J]. Commercial Arbitration and Mediation, 2024, (02): 69-81. WebAug 7, 2024 · In its recent decision in BNA v BNB and another [2024] SGHC 142, the Singapore High Court had to determine the law governing an arbitration clause in order to decide whether or not the tribunal in ... WebBNA v BNB and another [2024] SGHC 142 SUMMARY In the recent decision in BNA v BNB and another [2024] SGHC 142, the Singapore High Court dismissed an application challenging an arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction. The plaintiff argued that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction as the arbitration agreement was governed by the law of the millicent martin days of our lives